Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 8:22 PM
Subject: Regarding: Let's get our act in gear
Money is not the issue regarding quality education. In America, we are paying far more than is needed to provide quality education to our children.
Aside from the horrendous waste of our education dollar (across the board), the public should be furious at the cost of inner city schools in comparison to elite private schools. Thanks to Teacher Unions, government bureaucracy, government curriculum, we pay as much for inferior quality government schools—which are better at being training grounds for juvenile delinquency and truancy than academia—than it would cost to send them to the most elite private schools. This is not just a disgrace—it is destroying our nation.
Please view the short video on the true cost of government education (3 minutes): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzvKyfV3JtE
ALL children deserve an opportunity for a decent education—the obstacle are unions, government and special interests—not an insufficiency of money.
Can we eliminate the Department of Education (24.5 minutes): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KgUKptTzO8
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 7:40 PM
Subject: Let's get our act in gear
If you honestly believe that one race is superior or inferior to another, then you are a racist. If you believe that environment, incentive, motivation and hard work make the difference, then we need to get our acts in gear.
I’ve 13 years of K-12 and 6-1/2 years of higher education at colleges and universities. Many of you have much more. It was not until I had left college that I started learning how interesting and invigorating it can be to learn. Education can be drudgery or it can be fun, exciting, and illuminating. If you want to succeed in reducing the size of government, push back on Agenda 21, restore our 2nd Amendment rights and further so many other issues—perhaps the fastest way to make progress in this direction is to work to crush the Teacher Unions (which will help good teachers, weed out the bad ones, and benefit all students), get government completely out of the curriculum—and promote (starting with every inner city in America) school choice for parents and emancipated minors to choose the school—public, charter, or private via vouchers. Let’s get the poor on our side by being the advocates they need to help fight against the powerfully entrenched special interests so that their children can succeed as well as our own. If you want to scale back and eliminate all the counter-productive entitlement programs, then education is undoubtedly one of the best areas to start. You will not kill off the politically correct indoctrination of our nation as long as government controls what is being force fed into these impressionable minds, a curriculum which currently is conducive to destruction of our culture and historic way of life than anything else.
Coming End to Racial Preferences
Walter E. Williams
Last week's U.S. Supreme Court 6-2 ruling in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action et al. upheld Michigan's constitutional amendment that bans racial preferences in admission to its public universities. Justice Sonia Sotomayor lashed out at her colleagues in a bitter dissent, calling them "out of touch with reality." She went on to make the incredible argument that the amendment, which explicitly forbids racial discrimination, itself amounts to racial discrimination. Her argument was that permissible "race-sensitive admissions policies," the new name for racial preferences, both serve the compelling interest of obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body and inure people to the benefit of racial minorities. By the way, no one has come up with hard evidence of the supposed "educational benefits" that come from a racially mixed student body, and there's mounting evidence of harm done to minorities through academic mismatching.
Far more important than the legal battles over racial preferences in college admissions is the question of why they are being called for in the first place. The SAT's purpose is to predict how well a student will perform in college classes. Blacks score at least 100 points lower than whites in each of the assessment areas -- critical reading, math and writing. Asians score higher than whites in math and writing. SAT scores are also reported for Mexican-Americans, Puerto Ricans, Indians and others. Blacks score lower than these minorities, who themselves score lower than whites and Asians.
If we reject the racist notion of mental inferiority of blacks, holding that blacks can never compete academically and that "racially sensitive" college admissions are needed in perpetuity, we must seek an explanation for their relatively poor academic performance. My longtime colleague and friend Dr. Thomas Sowell offers some evidence in a recent column, "Will Dunbar Rise Again?" (http://tinyurl.com/mjt39ks). Paul Laurence Dunbar High School was founded in 1870 as the first public high school in the nation for black students. As far back as 1899, when tests were given in Washington's four academic high schools, Dunbar students scored higher than students in two of the three white high schools. Over the first several decades of the 20th century, about 80 percent of Dunbar graduates went on to college, a percentage far greater than that of high-school graduates of any race in the country at large at the time. Most blacks went to inexpensive local colleges, but among those who went on to Ivy League and other elite colleges, a significant number graduated Phi Beta Kappa. At one time, Dunbar graduates were admitted to Dartmouth or Harvard without having to take an entrance exam. One would have to be a lunatic to chalk up this academic success, in the early to mid-1900s, to Sotomayor's "race-sensitive admissions policies."
The shame of the nation is that poor black children are trapped in terrible schools. But worse than that is that white liberals, black politicians and civil rights leaders, perhaps unwittingly, have taken steps to ensure that black children remain trapped. Sowell says, "Of all the cynical frauds of the Obama administration, few are so despicable as sacrificing the education of poor and minority children to the interests of the teachers' unions." Attorney General Eric Holder's hostility, along with that of the teachers unions, toward the spread of charter schools is just one of the signs of that cynicism. Holder's threats against schools that discipline more black students than he thinks they should add official support to a hostile learning environment.
The weakening of racial preferences in college admissions can be beneficial if it can focus our attention on the causes of the huge gap in academic achievement between blacks and whites and Asians. Worrying about what happens when blacks are trying to get in to college is too late -- as a matter of fact 12 years late.